Twinkie
After viewing online pictures of the "Dolls Test" dolls on display at the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC), I wanted to know more about the dolls other than their copyright year and the manufacturer's name, 1968 and Effanbee, respectively. The museum label indicates "these and other dolls" were used in the Dolls Test. They were donated to the museum by the Clark's daughter. The 1968-marked dolls were used many years after the first 1940s Dolls Test dolls. The first dolls used were purchased from a Harlem Woolworths for 50 cents.
Links to the museum's black doll and white doll were sent to the Facebook group Let's ID Our Dolls with a request for help with the doll's name. One member replied, identifying the dolls as Effanbee's Twinkie.
Using Google, I found this image of a black Effanbee doll labeled as Twinkie from 1968. The doll's widow's peak looks similar to that of the dolls in the museum. This Pinterest image of a nude black doll is also described as Effanbee's Twinkie. Its description indicates the doll has its original hang tag. Effanbee's hang tags usually bear the doll's name. However, hang tag images were not shown for either of the above two dolls. In this completed eBay auction, this black doll has a hang tag that reads "Twinkie." The doll was described as being from the 1980s but nothing else regarding the doll's marks was included in the description. The "circa 1980s" timeframe could have been a seller error. These three dolls look like the dolls in the NMAAHC.
I shared this information with another doll enthusiast whose series of questions led to further research.
I had already referenced John Axe's book, Effanbee a Collector's Encyclopedia 1949-Present, which was published by my first publisher, Hobby House Press, Inc., in 1994. Axe's book shows that Twinkie was in Effanbee catalogs for the years, 1959-1967; 1970-1983, and 1984-1986. Note that 1968 is not included.
Referring to the pages in the book (illustrated above) on which these catalogs appear, none of the Twinkie dolls are listed as having been "Negro," which is the racial identity term Effanbee used in their catalogs for these years with an "N" placed behind the dolls' stock number and "Negro" spelled out in the associated description.
Why is the "Negro" version of Twinkie not listed in any of Effanbee's catalogs in Axe's book and why is Twinkie not listed in black or white versions in the 1968 catalog in the book? Did Axe not include some catalog information in his book, or were the dolls manufactured after the catalogs were published?
My Fair Baby
Effanbee's My Fair Baby from 1968 is shown in a screen-captured photograph. |
A Google search for "1968 Effanbee Doll" led me to a Ruby-Lane-sold doll by Effanbee named My Fair Baby. Since the link to Ruby Lane's actual buy page no longer exists, the doll is shown in a screen capture above. This doll also looks like the museum dolls.
Shown in the above scan from Effanbee's 1968 catalog in Axe's book, My Fair Baby was available as a black doll (4461N and 4481N) with molded and rooted hair, respectively. Like these versions of My Fair Baby, Effanbee dressed all My Fair Baby and Twinkie dolls from prior and subsequent years in baby-style clothing. Unlike the museum's donated dolls, none of these dolls were released wearing a diaper only.
To make the dolls' gender ambiguous, I believe the Clark's replaced the dolls' original clothing and created diapers using cotton waffle-weave cloth; or, the donated dolls were nude and the museum added the cloth diapers.
Side-by-side pictures of the black doll donated to the NMAAHC and the Ruby Lane doll sold as My Fair Baby |
I am not positively certain which doll was donated to the museum but based on the year, 1968, it seems plausible that the dolls are black and white versions of Effanbee's 1968 My Fair Baby dressed in replaced diapers.
As a side note, since 1960s-1980s Twinkie appears to share the same sculpt as My Fair Baby. Could it be that the name, My Fair Baby, was discontinued after 1968 and the mold continued in use for Twinkie? This would explain the reason for the eBay auction for a black circa 1980s Twinkie that looks like the 1960s doll. The fact that Axe's book does not document black versions of Twinkie could be an oversight on the author's part and/or Effanbee's failure to include the doll in their catalogs. Human error is always a possibility.
Related Post:
Simple Justice and see the links at the end of the Simple Justice post.
dbg
Thank you for following, commenting, and sharing using the share button below.
Check out what I am selling here.
Check out my eBay listings here.
Please follow my sister blog Ebony-Essence of Dolls in Black.
Donate here to support this blog. Thank you!
Do you know how much this doll goes for now? Thanks for posting.
ReplyDeleteHi Ticia,
DeleteOn eBay the price will vary. As I wrote in this post, a Twinkie from the 1980s (although not the same year as the one in the museum) sold for $20 on eBay. On eBay, the selling price always depends on how many people bid before the auction closes.
dbg
To clarify, the selling price on eBay or any auction will be based on how much interest there is for the doll at the time of the listing. We can always hope that items that we plan to bid on are not of interest to anyone else (until after we have bid and won!). :-)
Deletedbg
Good advice. Thanks
DeleteAlso did Bill Cosby use this type of doll in Part 2 of the delivery episode when the twins Winnie and Nelson were born? He used a doll similar to this one when showing Elvin how to scoop the baby up into his arms. For years I always wondered about dolls used on sets like those and whether or not they are donated to a museum or given to a family member? When I was Rudy's age I always assumed the dolls were given to Keisha to have in real life.
DeleteYou're welcome,Ticia.
DeleteI would have to watch that episode of Cosby to see if I can get a good look at the doll.
dbg
As much as the wonders of the internet seem to give us all the information in the world at our fingertips...I’m always surprised how hard it can be to track down information on dolls and collectibles still. Your above detective work is astounding and I’m so glad you were able to get even closer to definitively identifying the dolls used in the original experiment. I still use my old collector reference books to identify dolls or ask bloggers and collectors (like yourself) who help. I was watching an Antiques Roadshow the other day where someone brought in their LEGO collection and the show presenter acknowledged that collectibles and ‘antiques’ in the future will mean more likely pop culture and nostalgia items as the future of a show like Antiques Roadshow as less and less people collect olde worlde furniture and porcelain (think antique dolls vs. Barbie for example). So much that was dismissed as throw away culture (much like your initial observation that it would only be a doll collector who would be interested in the manufacturer of the original dolls used in this case) is going initially undocumented thankfully people like yourself are working to find the origin & genesis of our future history. ππΌ
ReplyDeleteHi Julius,
ReplyDeleteI still refer to old collector books, too for information on dolls. Unfortunately, where black dolls are concerned, not much coverage has been given unless the books were devoted to black dolls. Even then, several dolls will always remain a mystery for the ages until someone traces their origin. Doll research is definitely a form of genealogy.
Thank you for appreciating my desire to tell these untold stories of the who, what, when, where, and why about a doll's history. I am confident now that what I do will help someone in their search for doll information. If not now, it will in the future. It helps that I enjoy research and sharing the information.
dbg